My method was to calculate the average points per game for each team in both the Erhardt and Gardiner conferences (points/ 32 games). Then I calculated the average per game against teams from the other conference (total points – conference points/20 games). For each team I could then calculate the points total in the hypothetical unified league (24 games x average within conference + 30 x average across conference). Here’s an example:
Edinburgh got 32 points from 32 games in the Gardiner, giving them an average of 1 point per game in their own league.
They got 46 points in total, which means they got 14 points against Erhardt teams over 20 games: 14/20 = 0.7 per game
In the unified league they would get a total of 24 x 1 (they can’t play themselves) + (30 x 0.7) = 45 points
Now, of course there are lots of flaws with this approach. Things wouldn’t work out this way in reality, but over a season it gives a pretty good indication. If we do this for every team, the league would have looked like this:
Cardiff and Braehead swap and so do Caps and Flyers, but actually I was surprised at how little difference it made. Sheffield still win by 2 points, Dundee are still very bottom, and most teams retain the same spot. There still might be a case for unifying the league (if that Cardiff – Braehead swap had meant the league title I might not be so sanguine), but it might not be as big a factor as we sometimes suppose.
I haven’t had my working out checked by teacher so it could be wrong, if so, let me know.
]]>